In Debt to Crimson Dawn

-2.5 RE 100% ⚖ Compare

Score Breakdown

Expected stat points	4.0
Stat bonus	0.0
Ability value	-0.8 Ability breakdown exhaust_unless: -0.38 RE (static x1.0, unless)
Total value	-0.8

Premier

Theoretical Δ	Significantly Overcosted	-2.5 RE Theoretical breakdown Stat bonus: +0.0 Ability value: -0.8 Expected: −4.0 ───────────── Δ stat points: -4.75 ÷ 2 = -2.47 RE
Intrinsic		-2.5 RE
Contextual		+0.0 RE
Adjusted Δ	Significantly Overcosted	-7.9 RE Adjusted breakdown Theoretical: -2.47 RE Win rate: 28.0% Meta share: 0.1% Avg copies (MD): 1.9 Tournament RE: -11.00 Play-pattern Δ: -0.46 Meta weight: 0.18 ───────────── Adjusted: -7.91 RE

Adjusted Δ blends the theoretical score with tournament performance. This card has a 28.0% win rate across 0.1% of the meta, averaging 1.9 copies per deck. Tournament data pulls this card below its paper value.

Eternal

Theoretical Δ	Significantly Overcosted	-2.4 RE Theoretical breakdown Stat bonus: +0.0 Ability value: -0.8 Expected: −4.0 ───────────── Δ stat points: -4.75 ÷ 2 = -2.38 RE
Intrinsic		-2.4 RE
Contextual		+0.0 RE

No tournament data available for Eternal. Showing theoretical score only. The adjusted score blends formula-based analysis with real tournament performance, capturing intangible value that stat lines and ability text alone can't measure.